Skip to content
Accessibility
  • Text Size:
  • Normal
  • Large
  • Larger
  • Screen Colours:
  • Normal
  • Black & Yellow
The Ipswich Society
  • Home
    About Us Contact Us Membership Publications Links Privacy Notice
  • Newsletter
    Newsletter, April 2022 (Issue 229) Newsletter, January 2022 (Issue 228) Newsletter, October 2021 (Issue 227) Newsletter, July 2021 (Issue 226) Newsletter, April 2021 (Issue 225) Newsletter, January 2021 (issue 224) Newsletter, October 2020 (Issue 223) Newsletter, August 2020 (issue 222) Newsletter, July 2020 (Issue 221) Newsletter, May 2020 (issue 220) Newsletter, April 2020 (Issue 219) Newsletter, January 2020 (Issue 218) Newsletter, October 2019 (Issue 217) Newsletter, July 2019 (Issue 216) Newsletter, April 2019 (Issue 215) Newsletter, January 2019 (Issue 214) Newsletter, October 2018 (Issue 213) Newsletter, July 2018 (Issue 212) Newsletter, April 2018 (Issue 211) Newsletter, January 2018 (Issue 210) Newsletter, October 2017 (Issue 209) Newsletter, July 2017 (Issue 208) Newsletter. April 2017 (issue 207) Newsletter, January 2017 (Issue 206) Newsletter, October 2016 (issue 205) Newsletter, July 2016 (Issue 204) Newsletter, April 2016 (Issue 203) Newsletter, January 2016 (Issue 202) Newsletter, October 2015 (Issue 201) Newsletter, July 2015 (Issue 200) Newsletter, April 2015 (Issue 199) Newsletter, January 2015 (Issue 198) Newsletter, October 2014 (Issue 197) Newsletter, July 2014 (Issue 196) Newsletter, April 2014 (Issue 195) Newsletter, January 2014 (Issue 194) Newsletter, October 2013 (Issue 193) Newsletter, July 2013 (Issue 192) Newsletter, April 2013 (Issue 191) Newsletter, January 2013 (Issue 190) Newsletter, October 2012 (Issue 189) Newsletter, July 2012 (Issue 188) Newsletter, April 2012 (Issue 187) Newsletter, January 2012 (Issue 186) Newsletter, October 2011 (issue 185) Newsletter, July 2011 (issue 184) Newsletter, April 2011 (issue 183) Newsletter, January 2011 (issue 182) Newsletter, October 2010 (Issue 181) Newsletter, July 2010 (Issue 180) Newsletter, April 2010 (Issue 179) Newsletter, January 2010 (Issue 178) Newsletter, October 2009 (Issue 177) Newsletter, July 2009 (Issue 176) Newsletter, April 2009 (Issue 175) Newsletter, January 2009 (Issue 174) Newsletter, October 2008 (Issue 173) Newsletter, July 2008 (issue 172) Newsletter, April 2008 (issue 171) Newsletter, January 2008 (Issue 170) Newsletter, October 2007 (Issue 169) Newsletter, October 2005 (Issue 161) Newsletter, July 2005 (Issue 160) Newsletter, April 2005 (Issue 159) Newsletter, January 2005 (Issue 158) Newsletter, October 2004 (Issue 157) Newsletter, July 2004 (Issue 156) Newsletter, April 2004 (Issue 155) Newsletter, January 2004 (Issue 154) Newsletter, October 2003 (Issue 153) Newsletter, July 2003 (Issue 152) Newsletter, April 2003 (Issue 151) Newsletter, January 2003 (Issue 150) Newsletter, October 2002 (Issue 149) Newsletter, July 2002 (Issue 148) Newsletter, April 2002 (Issue 147) Newsletter, January 2002 (Issue 146) Newsletter, October 2001 (Issue 145) Newsletter, July 2001 (Issue 144) Newsletter, April 2001 (Issue 143) Newsletter, January 2001 (Issue 142) Newsletter, October 2000 (Issue 141) Newsletter, July 2000 (Issue 140) Newsletter, April 2000 (Issue 139) Newsletter, January 2000 (Issue 138) Newsletter, July 1990 (Issue 100)
  • Planning
  • Events
    2022 Annual Awards Evening 2022 Heritage Open Days - Ipswich Forthcoming Events 2022
  • Fore St Facelift
    '61 Drawings '61 Photographs Audio/Film History Press/print Credits
  • Heritage Icons
    Ancient House Arlingtons Bethesda Baptist Church Blackfriars Brickmakers Wood Broomhill Library Broomhill Lido Cardinal Wolsey Christchurch Mansion Christ Church URC church 4 College Street Custom House Felaw's house Fore Street Baths Freemasons Hall Gippeswyk Hall Great White Horse Guided walks Ipswich Institute ​​​​​​​Ipswich Museum ​​​​​​​Ipswich School Ipswich Station Isaac Lord complex Merchant House Mutual House The Old Bell Orwell Bridge Public Hall Pykenham's Gatehouse Ragged Schools St Clement's Church St Helen's Church St Lawrence Church St Margaret's Church St Mary at the Elms Church St Mary le Tower Church St Mary at Stoke Church St Pancras Church St Peter's Church St Stephen's Church Stoke Hill Tunnel The Hold Tidal barrier Tooley's House Town Hall & Corn Exchange Unitarian Meeting House Wet Dock Willis Building
  • Blue plaques
    Other plaques in Ipswich
  • Archive
    Original Society website Banner/map Annual reviews by the Chair

Corn or carbuncle?

Newsletter » Newsletter, July 2017 (Issue 208) » Corn or carbuncle?

Corn or carbuncle?

A crowded public gallery was present in Grafton House for the meeting of the Planning and Development Committee on the last day of May. There was a packed agenda and for the first time under this particular chairman, a split decision (on an infill plot in Rosehill Road).

Most of the public were there for the application by Ipswich Sports Club to build houses on the old hockey pitch; the developer spoke reminding the committee of the planning directive for more homes as a priority. Two objectors repeated the same message as had been conveyed in 100 individual letters but the scheme was carried.

The application for improvements to the Cornhill was comprehensively presented by the Chief Planning Officer. He was followed by John Norman who took the opportunity to point out the potential pitfalls of the scheme. There were two immediate difficulties with the Society's position:-

i) The Ipswich Society support the need for a new surface. After 30 years of traffic the red bricks are tired, worn and shabby, and here is an opportunity to make something of the Cornhill and of the buildings in the immediate vicinity, but without the extensive clutter proposed.

ii) Most members who had corresponded were suggesting that a sum over £3 million was excessive for the work envisaged. However the Planning committee is not the forum for discussions about Council expenditure. Had the application been by any other developer no-one would have known the cost of the scheme.

John's main point of contention was the lack of commitment to the scheme by Suffolk County Council. A letter within the application documents clearly stated that SCC (the Highway Authority) would not be responsible for the maintenance of the new road surface, for the trees, street furniture, steps or fountains. A very negative letter considering that SCC are joint partners in funding the capital cost.

The removal of the two Norwegian Maple trees outside the old Post Office (trees in a Conservation Area are protected) was unnecessary and would be a sad loss of an important amenity. John went on to remind the committee that there was nothing in the proposals (as proposed by Ipswich Vision) that there should be better use of the Town Hall, Corn Exchange and old Post Office. Perhaps some of the proposed expenditure on street clutter could be better used to improve access and long term use of those buildings.

The Cornhill, at 0.3 hectares is a very small space for a town square. It was small in the nineteenth century when the population was under 100,000, even more so today with twice that number of potential users. A town square where the usable space should not be lost to sculptural figures, fountains and steps.

As is frequently the case with planning applications, important details are left as reserved matters, discussion and decision between architect and planning officer. Such is the case here in respect of the materials to be used as surfacing material: slabs, tiles or setts, the choice of granite or some other stone, and the prominent colour will clearly have an impact on the ambience of the finished scheme. John suggested that with such an important decision the scheme should not be approved until the detail is known.

Speakers at Planning Meetings are limited to five minutes but the Chairman appreciated the importance of this scheme and the need to clarify the views of a large number of objectors so held the red light until John had finished. It was to no avail. The committee were keen for the scheme to progress (it having been five years since Sir Stuart Rose first suggested improvements and insulted Ipswich) and approved the application.

Copyright © 2022, The Ipswich Society

onesuffolk

By using our website you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you would like to know how we use our cookies or how you can block cookies in your browser please click on our cookie policy.