Skip to content
Accessibility
  • Text Size:
  • Normal
  • Large
  • Larger
  • Screen Colours:
  • Normal
  • Black & Yellow
The Ipswich Society
  • Home
    About Us Contact Us Membership Publications Links Privacy Notice
  • Newsletter
    Newsletter, April 2022 (Issue 229) Newsletter, January 2022 (Issue 228) Newsletter, October 2021 (Issue 227) Newsletter, July 2021 (Issue 226) Newsletter, April 2021 (Issue 225) Newsletter, January 2021 (issue 224) Newsletter, October 2020 (Issue 223) Newsletter, August 2020 (issue 222) Newsletter, July 2020 (Issue 221) Newsletter, May 2020 (issue 220) Newsletter, April 2020 (Issue 219) Newsletter, January 2020 (Issue 218) Newsletter, October 2019 (Issue 217) Newsletter, July 2019 (Issue 216) Newsletter, April 2019 (Issue 215) Newsletter, January 2019 (Issue 214) Newsletter, October 2018 (Issue 213) Newsletter, July 2018 (Issue 212) Newsletter, April 2018 (Issue 211) Newsletter, January 2018 (Issue 210) Newsletter, October 2017 (Issue 209) Newsletter, July 2017 (Issue 208) Newsletter. April 2017 (issue 207) Newsletter, January 2017 (Issue 206) Newsletter, October 2016 (issue 205) Newsletter, July 2016 (Issue 204) Newsletter, April 2016 (Issue 203) Newsletter, January 2016 (Issue 202) Newsletter, October 2015 (Issue 201) Newsletter, July 2015 (Issue 200) Newsletter, April 2015 (Issue 199) Newsletter, January 2015 (Issue 198) Newsletter, October 2014 (Issue 197) Newsletter, July 2014 (Issue 196) Newsletter, April 2014 (Issue 195) Newsletter, January 2014 (Issue 194) Newsletter, October 2013 (Issue 193) Newsletter, July 2013 (Issue 192) Newsletter, April 2013 (Issue 191) Newsletter, January 2013 (Issue 190) Newsletter, October 2012 (Issue 189) Newsletter, July 2012 (Issue 188) Newsletter, April 2012 (Issue 187) Newsletter, January 2012 (Issue 186) Newsletter, October 2011 (issue 185) Newsletter, July 2011 (issue 184) Newsletter, April 2011 (issue 183) Newsletter, January 2011 (issue 182) Newsletter, October 2010 (Issue 181) Newsletter, July 2010 (Issue 180) Newsletter, April 2010 (Issue 179) Newsletter, January 2010 (Issue 178) Newsletter, October 2009 (Issue 177) Newsletter, July 2009 (Issue 176) Newsletter, April 2009 (Issue 175) Newsletter, January 2009 (Issue 174) Newsletter, October 2008 (Issue 173) Newsletter, July 2008 (issue 172) Newsletter, April 2008 (issue 171) Newsletter, January 2008 (Issue 170) Newsletter, October 2007 (Issue 169) Newsletter, October 2005 (Issue 161) Newsletter, July 2005 (Issue 160) Newsletter, April 2005 (Issue 159) Newsletter, January 2005 (Issue 158) Newsletter, October 2004 (Issue 157) Newsletter, July 2004 (Issue 156) Newsletter, April 2004 (Issue 155) Newsletter, January 2004 (Issue 154) Newsletter, October 2003 (Issue 153) Newsletter, July 2003 (Issue 152) Newsletter, April 2003 (Issue 151) Newsletter, January 2003 (Issue 150) Newsletter, October 2002 (Issue 149) Newsletter, July 2002 (Issue 148) Newsletter, April 2002 (Issue 147) Newsletter, January 2002 (Issue 146) Newsletter, October 2001 (Issue 145) Newsletter, July 2001 (Issue 144) Newsletter, April 2001 (Issue 143) Newsletter, January 2001 (Issue 142) Newsletter, October 2000 (Issue 141) Newsletter, July 2000 (Issue 140) Newsletter, April 2000 (Issue 139) Newsletter, January 2000 (Issue 138) Newsletter, July 1990 (Issue 100)
  • Planning
  • Events
    2022 Annual Awards Evening 2022 Heritage Open Days - Ipswich Forthcoming Events 2022
  • Fore St Facelift
    '61 Drawings '61 Photographs Audio/Film History Press/print Credits
  • Heritage Icons
    Ancient House Arlingtons Bethesda Baptist Church Blackfriars Brickmakers Wood Broomhill Library Broomhill Lido Cardinal Wolsey Christchurch Mansion Christ Church URC church 4 College Street Custom House Felaw's house Fore Street Baths Freemasons Hall Gippeswyk Hall Great White Horse Guided walks Ipswich Institute ​​​​​​​Ipswich Museum ​​​​​​​Ipswich School Ipswich Station Isaac Lord complex Merchant House Mutual House The Old Bell Orwell Bridge Public Hall Pykenham's Gatehouse Ragged Schools St Clement's Church St Helen's Church St Lawrence Church St Margaret's Church St Mary at the Elms Church St Mary le Tower Church St Mary at Stoke Church St Pancras Church St Peter's Church St Stephen's Church Stoke Hill Tunnel The Hold Tidal barrier Tooley's House Town Hall & Corn Exchange Unitarian Meeting House Wet Dock Willis Building
  • Blue plaques
    Other plaques in Ipswich
  • Archive
    Original Society website Banner/map Annual reviews by the Chair

Letters to the Editor

Newsletter » Newsletter, July 2014 (Issue 196) » Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

Ipswich football ground

from Ben Gummer MP

I was bemused by Colin Kreidewolf's letter claiming that there was 'a worrying trend' of the Society's Newsletter containing inaccuracies, not least because his own letter contained one. He claimed that I had put a value of a million pounds on the football ground, which I have never done.

I must congratulate Mr Kreidewolf, however, for using the powers in the Localism Act 2011 to help protect the Portman Road ground. It is a fine piece of legislation and I was pleased to have voted for it myself, on behalf of Mr Kreidewolf and all my constituents. I am glad that is being put to good use.

Nothing Changes! 41 years ago...

from Chris Wiltshire

I'm a continual reader of James Lees-Milne's Diaries. I suppose he might need some introduction to members but his long association with heritage and conservation matters makes him a very interesting commentator.

Diary entry Saturday 25th November 1972:

"I lose battles all along the line, The Rural District Council has decided - I knew of course that they would - to allow the erection of an enormous cow factory in the Ozleworth valley behind this village [a Cotswold area close to J L-M's house at Alderley], in spite of the valley being within the AONB which stands for Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. These designations mean absolutely nothing. There is always a reason venal or financial - same thing - for the local authority to give way. Beauty of the landscape is absolutely at a discount in England. Let us face it. The most beautiful country in Northern Europe in my youth will before my death be irredeemably ruined, damned and finished. Within one's lifetime - it is a terrifying thought; and since it coincides within my lifetime I feel fractionally responsible". From: A Mingled Measure, James Lees-Milne Diaries 1953-1972, pub. John Murray 1994

Do members feel that Lees-Milne was being overly conservative, pessimistic and reactionary? After all, he was largely responsible for managing the handover of some of the best houses that the National Trust now cares for. Without his advocacy and skills many would have been demolished in the 1930s to 1950s.

AGM: Cornhill

from Kay McElhinney

During the talk at the AGM by Richard Lister and Paul Clement, something was bothering me about their presentation but I couldn't put my finger on quite what. Afterwards it dawned on me what the problem was: whereas during their 'pitch' they reiterated their main campaigning point - i.e. to join the town centre to the Waterfront and restore the North-south axis of the town and the flow of pedestrian traffic in that direction - the design for the Cornhill they are proposing reinforces the current East-West axis and runs counter to their main campaign.

The layout for the new Cornhill runs East-West; the paving design draws the eye East-West; the visual focal point (the tower) is on the East-West axis; and from what I could see, in order to use what is currently the most popular route to the Waterfront on the north-south axis, pedestrians will have to negotiate a flight of steps which could prove to be a barrier. And if they are keen to stimulate retail in the town centre, where traditional shop-based retail is failing and the main recent retail successes have been the various markets which bring a lot of people into the town, why restrict the space available? Why not use the North-South axis and bring Lloyds Avenue, Princes Street and Queen Street into the market's usable space and really join the town centre to the Waterfront?

As a secondary issue, I am concerned about the expense of creating better access to the Town Hall via the steps and losing the steps as picturesque amenity (choirs at Christmas, UCS new-graduate photos, for example) before a plan has been drawn up for how the interior will be used and how it will need to be reconfigured, as once that is done perhaps it may turn out that the best entrance might be via Princes Street and the entrance via the steps could be redundant?

AGM: Ipswich town centre development

from Ken Wilson

The speakers at the AGM provoked a lively debate and it was clear that the future of our town centre, particularly the shops, is dear to the hearts of our members.

I felt my thoughts drifting back some years to the time when two or three shopping precincts were on offer and after much careful consideration and debate approval was given to Tower Ramparts. We were assured that because we were a little later than many places we would have a really first-class product, the faults that had emerged in early schemes having all been ironed out. Ours consequently would be flawless.

A couple of years later Tower Ramparts was extensively remodelled.

When not long afterwards the Buttermarket precinct appeared we were invited to make an inspection and a large group from the Society was shown round. During the discussion that followed I referred to the Tower Ramparts experience and asked the manager how long it would be before his development would need to be adapted. He paused to smile indulgently at my naivety then said firmly that this shopping precinct was undoubtedly complete.

A couple of years later history repeated itself.

What this tells me is that the confident assertions of those most ready to assure us that they know just what is needed to revitalise our town must be treated with a degree of caution.

AGM: Steps and slopes for the Cornhill?

from Neil Salmon

Our speakers at the Society's AGM, Paul Clement and Richard Lister, made an admirable case for "turning our town around". I am sure that their strategic vision is the way forward, in recognising above all that:

1. The Wet Dock enables the modern Waterfront to be the unique asset of the town.

2. Therefore linking the Waterfront with the town centre is crucial.

3. Modern methods of shopping mean that the town centre must offer more mixed attractions.

4. Some superfluous shops will need to be converted to include residential uses.

5. Attracting new private investment is essential.

My only personal issue of disagreement is their support for proposals to create different levels of the Cornhill which would have potentially hazardous steps and slopes. My view is that the Cornhill is already a small area for a large town. To create different levels would make it less, not more, flexible. Despite its present natural slope, it is possible to include an enlarged and varying market, and on other days events involving free movement across the whole space.

If improving access to the Town Hall is one reason for changing levels of the Cornhill, that seems to me too big a price to pay. I hope my criticism will be seen not as nostalgic or reactionary but as purely practical.

Copyright © 2022, The Ipswich Society

onesuffolk

By using our website you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you would like to know how we use our cookies or how you can block cookies in your browser please click on our cookie policy.