Skip to content
Accessibility
  • Text Size:
  • Normal
  • Large
  • Larger
  • Screen Colours:
  • Normal
  • Black & Yellow
The Ipswich Society
  • Home
    About Us Contact Us Membership Publications Links Privacy Notice
  • Newsletter
    Newsletter, April 2022 (Issue 229) Newsletter, January 2022 (Issue 228) Newsletter, October 2021 (Issue 227) Newsletter, July 2021 (Issue 226) Newsletter, April 2021 (Issue 225) Newsletter, January 2021 (issue 224) Newsletter, October 2020 (Issue 223) Newsletter, August 2020 (issue 222) Newsletter, July 2020 (Issue 221) Newsletter, May 2020 (issue 220) Newsletter, April 2020 (Issue 219) Newsletter, January 2020 (Issue 218) Newsletter, October 2019 (Issue 217) Newsletter, July 2019 (Issue 216) Newsletter, April 2019 (Issue 215) Newsletter, January 2019 (Issue 214) Newsletter, October 2018 (Issue 213) Newsletter, July 2018 (Issue 212) Newsletter, April 2018 (Issue 211) Newsletter, January 2018 (Issue 210) Newsletter, October 2017 (Issue 209) Newsletter, July 2017 (Issue 208) Newsletter. April 2017 (issue 207) Newsletter, January 2017 (Issue 206) Newsletter, October 2016 (issue 205) Newsletter, July 2016 (Issue 204) Newsletter, April 2016 (Issue 203) Newsletter, January 2016 (Issue 202) Newsletter, October 2015 (Issue 201) Newsletter, July 2015 (Issue 200) Newsletter, April 2015 (Issue 199) Newsletter, January 2015 (Issue 198) Newsletter, October 2014 (Issue 197) Newsletter, July 2014 (Issue 196) Newsletter, April 2014 (Issue 195) Newsletter, January 2014 (Issue 194) Newsletter, October 2013 (Issue 193) Newsletter, July 2013 (Issue 192) Newsletter, April 2013 (Issue 191) Newsletter, January 2013 (Issue 190) Newsletter, October 2012 (Issue 189) Newsletter, July 2012 (Issue 188) Newsletter, April 2012 (Issue 187) Newsletter, January 2012 (Issue 186) Newsletter, October 2011 (issue 185) Newsletter, July 2011 (issue 184) Newsletter, April 2011 (issue 183) Newsletter, January 2011 (issue 182) Newsletter, October 2010 (Issue 181) Newsletter, July 2010 (Issue 180) Newsletter, April 2010 (Issue 179) Newsletter, January 2010 (Issue 178) Newsletter, October 2009 (Issue 177) Newsletter, July 2009 (Issue 176) Newsletter, April 2009 (Issue 175) Newsletter, January 2009 (Issue 174) Newsletter, October 2008 (Issue 173) Newsletter, July 2008 (issue 172) Newsletter, April 2008 (issue 171) Newsletter, January 2008 (Issue 170) Newsletter, October 2007 (Issue 169) Newsletter, October 2005 (Issue 161) Newsletter, July 2005 (Issue 160) Newsletter, April 2005 (Issue 159) Newsletter, January 2005 (Issue 158) Newsletter, October 2004 (Issue 157) Newsletter, July 2004 (Issue 156) Newsletter, April 2004 (Issue 155) Newsletter, January 2004 (Issue 154) Newsletter, October 2003 (Issue 153) Newsletter, July 2003 (Issue 152) Newsletter, April 2003 (Issue 151) Newsletter, January 2003 (Issue 150) Newsletter, October 2002 (Issue 149) Newsletter, July 2002 (Issue 148) Newsletter, April 2002 (Issue 147) Newsletter, January 2002 (Issue 146) Newsletter, October 2001 (Issue 145) Newsletter, July 2001 (Issue 144) Newsletter, April 2001 (Issue 143) Newsletter, January 2001 (Issue 142) Newsletter, October 2000 (Issue 141) Newsletter, July 2000 (Issue 140) Newsletter, April 2000 (Issue 139) Newsletter, January 2000 (Issue 138) Newsletter, July 1990 (Issue 100)
  • Planning
  • Events
    2022 Annual Awards Evening 2022 Heritage Open Days - Ipswich Forthcoming Events 2022
  • Fore St Facelift
    '61 Drawings '61 Photographs Audio/Film History Press/print Credits
  • Heritage Icons
    Ancient House Arlingtons Bethesda Baptist Church Blackfriars Brickmakers Wood Broomhill Library Broomhill Lido Cardinal Wolsey Christchurch Mansion Christ Church URC church 4 College Street Custom House Felaw's house Fore Street Baths Freemasons Hall Gippeswyk Hall Great White Horse Guided walks Ipswich Institute ​​​​​​​Ipswich Museum ​​​​​​​Ipswich School Ipswich Station Isaac Lord complex Merchant House Mutual House The Old Bell Orwell Bridge Public Hall Pykenham's Gatehouse Ragged Schools St Clement's Church St Helen's Church St Lawrence Church St Margaret's Church St Mary at the Elms Church St Mary le Tower Church St Mary at Stoke Church St Pancras Church St Peter's Church St Stephen's Church Stoke Hill Tunnel The Hold Tidal barrier Tooley's House Town Hall & Corn Exchange Unitarian Meeting House Wet Dock Willis Building
  • Blue plaques
    Other plaques in Ipswich
  • Archive
    Original Society website Banner/map Annual reviews by the Chair

Letters To The Editor

Newsletter » Newsletter, April 2004 (Issue 155) » Letters To The Editor

Letters To The Editor

RE-VITALISE THE EASTERN END OF THE TOWN CENTRE
From Dave Morgan

My latest missive to you is prompted by apparently conflicting reports in the Evening Star that, on the one hand, Ipswich is out-performing Norwich in terms of visitors and retail sales whereas, on the other, there is a continuing failure on the part of the potential developers to get the much needed Mint Quarter under way. It doesn't add up!

The forthcoming re-location of most County Council staff from County Hall to Russell Road will add, certainly in the short term, to the deterioration in this area of town, although I suppose the residential developments on both sides of the start of Woodbridge Road will redress the balance to some extent and, hopefully, the development of a university in the immediate area will materialise?

However, in the short to medium term, unless something is done The Wash (Upper Orwell Street etc) will just get worse and the ghastly edifice that is the Odeon together with the rundown Regent just add to what I do hope is just a temporary gloom to this area of town. The situation is now made worse by the news that at the other end of town the Civic Centre campus may become a Waitrose supermarket - God preserve us!

All this prompts me, Mr Editor, to repeat my earlier complaint that, if the Borough Council wishes to maintain this dubious advantage over Norwich, it must concentrate on the revitalisation of the eastern end of the town centre and firmly put the pressure on whoever NCP and Helical really are. The delay on the Cox Lane site is nothing short of criminal and indeed I suspect that is where most of us would like to see Waitrose go - and give us the parent, John Lewis, as well! I implore the Society's senior officers to seek to re-direct the Borough Council's concentration just a wee bit from the Waterfront and the Civic Centre sites.

CAR HARDSTANDING SPACES
From Stuart Waller

I was somewhat surprised at your notes under Recent Planning Matters (January Newsletter) re 25 Tuddenham Road. Perhaps the Society could comment on what principle they are talking about when the Society believes that permission should not be granted for construction of car hardstanding and retaining walls as a matter of "principle".

To try to reduce the number of cars in the town centre by refusing permission is very very unlikely to have the desired effect -just more likely that another vehicle will be parked in surrounding roads. Surely it cannot be a policy to reduce the number of cars in the town centre by refusing extra car parking spaces. Planning permission is not required in the vast majority of cases and the Council has been busy building them for their own houses. Why should houses in Conservation Areas not have car standing spaces?

To have no parking for visitors would be quite a problem in Tuddenham Road as it has yellow lines for all that part of the road. Most of the large houses in that area have more than one car parking space. We must not lose sight of the fact that old houses are needed for modern living.

CAR HARDSTANDING : A REPLY TO THE LETTER ABOVE
From Mike Cook, Planning Monitor Co-ordinator, The Ipswich Society

I must apologise for my poor phrasing: the principle at stake is not the provision of parking around houses in general. 25 Tuddenham Road is a fine Victorian Locally Listed house with "Suffolk white brick front wall with red brick and corded decoration" and "Gate piers with stone capping". The owners cannot expect that they will automatically be allowed to carry out alterations to accommodate off-road car parking. The Society's view, which was discussed at an Executive Committee meeting, was confirmed after two meetings of the Conservation Panel and refusal by the Ipswich Borough Council Development Control Committee. This entails the two different proposals being considered by about forty people, some experts, some amateurs, and some elected. At the end of the day the wrong decision may have been reached for the wrong principles by the wrong people, but no one could say that it had not been inspected, considered and discussed enough. I think the correct view was taken. The principle is: the motor car or the environment.

Copyright © 2022, The Ipswich Society

onesuffolk

By using our website you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you would like to know how we use our cookies or how you can block cookies in your browser please click on our cookie policy.