Skip to content
Accessibility
  • Text Size:
  • Normal
  • Large
  • Larger
  • Screen Colours:
  • Normal
  • Black & Yellow
The Ipswich Society
  • Home
    About Us Contact Us Membership Links Privacy Notice
  • A town to be proud of
  • Newsletter
    Newsletter, January 2021 (issue 224) Newsletter, October 2020 (Issue 223) Newsletter, August 2020 (issue 222) Newsletter, July 2020 (Issue 221) Newsletter, May 2020 (issue 220) Newsletter, April 2020 (Issue 219) Newsletter, January 2020 (Issue 218) Newsletter, October 2019 (Issue 217) Newsletter, July 2019 (Issue 216) Newsletter, April 2019 (Issue 215) Newsletter, January 2019 (Issue 214) Newsletter, October 2018 (Issue 213) Newsletter, July 2018 (Issue 212) Newsletter, April 2009 (Issue 175) Newsletter, April 2018 (Issue 211) Newsletter, January 2018 (Issue 210) Newsletter, October 2017 (Issue 209) Newsletter, July 2017 (Issue 208) Newsletter. April 2017 (issue 207) Newsletter, January 2017 (Issue 206) Newsletter, October 2016 (issue 205) Newsletter, July 2016 (Issue 204) Newsletter, April 2016 (Issue 203) Newsletter, January 2016 (Issue 202) Newsletter, October 2015 (Issue 201) Newsletter, July 2015 (Issue 200) Newsletter, April 2015 (Issue 199) Newsletter, January 2015 (Issue 198) Newsletter, October 2014 (Issue 197) Newsletter, July 2014 (Issue 196) Newsletter, April 2014 (Issue 195) Newsletter, January 2014 (Issue 194) Newsletter, October 2013 (Issue 193) Newsletter, July 2013 (Issue 192) Newsletter, April 2013 (Issue 191) Newsletter, January 2013 (Issue 190) Newsletter, October 2012 (Issue 189) Newsletter, July 2012 (Issue 188) Newsletter, April 2012 (Issue 187) Newsletter, January 2012 (Issue 186) Newsletter, October 2011 (issue 185) Newsletter, July 2011 (issue 184) Newsletter, April 2011 (issue 183) Newsletter, January 2011 (issue 182) Newsletter, October 2010 (Issue 181) Newsletter, July 2010 (Issue 180) Newsletter, April 2010 (Issue 179) Newsletter, January 2010 (Issue 178) Newsletter, October 2009 (Issue 177) Newsletter, July 2009 (Issue 176) Newsletter, January 2009 (Issue 174) Newsletter, October 2008 (Issue 173) Newsletter, July 2008 (issue 172) Newsletter, April 2008 (issue 171) Newsletter, January 2008 (Issue 170) Newsletter, October 2005 (Issue 161) Newsletter, July 2005 (Issue 160) Newsletter, April 2005 (Issue 159) Newsletter, January 2005 (Issue 158) Newsletter, October 2004 (Issue 157) Newsletter, July 2004 (Issue 156) Newsletter, April 2004 (Issue 155) Newsletter, January 2004 (Issue 154) Newsletter, October 2003 (Issue 153) Newsletter, July 2003 (Issue 152) Newsletter, April 2003 (Issue 151) Newsletter, January 2003 (Issue 150) Newsletter, October 2002 (Issue 149) Newsletter, July 2002 (Issue 148) Newsletter, April 2002 (Issue 147) Newsletter, January 2002 (Issue 146) Newsletter, October 2001 (Issue 145) Newsletter, July 2001 (Issue 144) Newsletter, April 2001 (Issue 143) Newsletter, January 2001 (Issue 142) Newsletter, October 2000 (Issue 141) Newsletter, July 2000 (Issue 140) Newsletter, April 2000 (Issue 139) Newsletter, January 2000 (Issue 138) Newsletter, July 1990 (Issue 100)
  • Planning
  • Events
    2020 Annual Awards Evening 2020 Heritage Open Days - Ipswich Forthcoming Events 2020
  • Fore St Facelift
    '61 Drawings '61 Photographs Audio/Film History Press/print Credits
  • Blue plaques
    Other plaques in Ipswich
  • Publications
  • Archive
    Original Society website Banner/map Annual reviews by the Chair

John Lewis at Crane's

Newsletter » Newsletter, January 2012 (Issue 186) » John Lewis at Crane's

John Lewis at Crane's

Planning applications for John Lewis and Waitrose on the Crane's site, Nacton Road

Every Society welcomes the arrival of Britain's most successful retailer with its quality food, unbeatable value for money, unsurpassed service and excellent employee record for its partners. However, the Society believes that the Committee should consider the points we make very carefully and then refuse the application on this site. Our reasons are as follows:

Manufacturing Zone. Change of use of this site means the end of large scale manufacturing in the Borough. This may be pragmatic but we shall never be able to offer such a facility again. The new job opportunities the developers advertise will be at the upper end of their optimism. Research shows, and Mary Portas confirms, these are often displacement jobs.

Town Centre. The development of a major attractive retail draw this distance from the town centre will take shoppers who are in a higher socio-economic bracket away and thus discourage other retailers and developers from coming to the town centre. The first nail in the coffin was the granting of Tesco's consent and this would be the second. And we contend there are at least two large sites undeveloped and zoned for retail. We believe this will be disastrous for the quality of the town centre shopping for years to come.

The Portas Report has made two important recommendations which, assuming they are brought into force, are relevant to this application. Number 14 would "make explicit a presumption in favour of Town Centre development in the wording of the National Planning Policy Framework." Number 15 would "introduce Secretary of State exceptional sign off' for all new out-of-town developments and require all large developments to have an "affordable shops' quota." These two sections which are likely to be advised as relevant in the near future would make refusal more sensible.

The traffic generated by successive developments in north east Ipswich will produce stagnation, not just of the local roads but also of the A14 at the Nacton Road junction (junction 57). 4,100 cars a day are set to visit the site. Half will come from Ipswich and the other half from Saxmundham in the north to Witham in the south, the Essex Coast, Bury and Diss, all driving along the A14. The Highways Agency feels there is no reason to alter junction 57 despite there actually being a tailback on the eastbound carriageway on Google Maps. A third lane, it is agreed, will be inserted at the Warren Heath roundabout and that is the sum of improvements, they state, that is needed in a road layout that we have on good authority is at "capacity most of the day."

At the very least, the Committee should insist on conditions which provide for funding of improvements in the future. This area is one of the Borough's main revenue earning business parks and incidentally houses the main Fire and Rescue station and close by Ipswich Hospital and ambulance station and we really cannot allow it to become gridlocked.

We believe, therefore, that the interests of the majority of the Borough would be best served by refusal of this application and a review of siting in a town centre location.

Copyright © 2021, The Ipswich Society

onesuffolk

By using our website you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you would like to know how we use our cookies or how you can block cookies in your browser please click on our cookie policy.